Skip to main content

Constructive Blame storming and using Devils Advocate in problem solving and competency development

Cover of "Six Thinking Hats"
Cover of Six Thinking Hats

Discussions leads to solutions , mistakes leads to innovations, As part of innovation , solution approaches, models quite often used technique in healthy discussions on day to day basis is Brain Storming, mischievously known as blame storming.

To the extent organizations build competency around subjects of real time situations, till it takes to materialized very few of them make it to the concrete implementations. Take for example Google revolutionized the way we use internet with countable team, that storm sustained and now second wave coming from Facebook, Linked etc. Questions asked about their revenue models but skepticism will always there, social networks are strong tools not only for marketing but of communication, collaboration, and increased productivity and realized intangible benefits.

Discussions are full of Arguments, counter arguments, statements, facts, thesis, anti thesis etc. Contextually the term devil's advocate can be discussed here, Devil's advocate is someone who, given a certain argument, takes a position he or she does not necessarily agree with, just for the sake of argument to test the quality of the original argument and identify weaknesses in its structure, and to use such information to either improve or abandon the original, opposing position. So a devils advocate helps in testifying the strength of the opinion and justified to be relevant, which can be of importance in brain storming process, it may or may not create lateral arguments, or form synergies. 

Any thoughts during brain storming process can be presented it may be of relevance or not. Decisions cannot be made during this process. Obviously during discussions, participants ideas should be connected to the problem areas. Edward de bono's technique of six thinking hats for discussions in which each participants wears different hats of thought to think in different ways to the same problem with a different perspective with different roles for solution approaches helps a lot for a healthy brain storming session.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aligning Projects with CSR (Corporate social responsibility)

CSR ( Corporate social responsibility ) in context to Project management : Projects are unique entity units, they have a start and a logical end. Projects executes in a time frame with certain goals and objectives to achieve by the end of project and obviously Business as whole is connected with project where sustainability matters. Project managers seek responsibility and accountability from each team members in projects to make project a success, there comes the role of CSR wherein project managers can engage project members to achieve the stated objectives in a project in a sustainable way with responsibility. Corporates do CSR but at the corporate level, if we drill down CSR initiatives at the implementation level and align operational objectives with CSR which can drive projects in a holistic way by driving individuals inside-out from organization perspective and projects outside-in. CSR is just not one word but a gamut of activities are associated with it where in on...

Organization development in context

Egyptians left a mark of the civilization in the form of pyramids. pyramids are symbol of high integrity. Pyramids tells a story of time and  built symmetrically in layers. Pyramids have been built over a period of long time and not easily destroyed. Organizations development is a phenomenon which encompasses human potentials to be explored and directional in nature. Lets look at the pyramid again with help of a mirror, moving up from flat to top from concrete to transcendental and moving from flat to bottom reflects. Organization development OD is contextual again based on relevance. OD evolves on group and team purpose and objectives. OD Types  likely hood are hierarchical ,bureaucratic, matrix, ,pyramidal, entrepreneurial, flat, team oriented etc. in nature. Size of the organization also determines the type of development. OD reflects the culture of the org and it will encircle the overall vision and mission of the org by operating procedures. OD in recent ti...

Agile vs. Metrics

Vectorized from: Ken Schwaber, Mike Beedle: Agile Software Development with Scrum Prentice Hall PTR, 2001 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Over the years, its by human nature to quantify most of the aspect when it comes to Return on investment . Project dashboard are meant to provide bird view of the project's overall health from a top level perspective. Although it gives a broad level view of the time lines , resource utilization, budget and so on so forth. Can we quantify performance indicators like human aspect of deliverable like motivation levels of team members, quality of customer sustenance, business continuity etc. Since emotional intelligence has certain predominance over IQ definitely it matters. In concurrent times of agile development where practices like scrum, iterative development , extreme programming are kind of just in time techniques to deliver solutions to different kind of projects. can we be able to quantify human aspect of indicators in agile ...