Skip to main content

Porter's outside-in and Hammel - Prahald's Inside-out


Over the years inspiration and motivation to out do something which creates spark in the
genre of concurrent times is always been challenge for all of us, to make things happen requires a plan, an out of the box solution to rationalize its existence.

More often than not inspiration are unknown to us, which may leads to different scenarios of multiple ways of looking at things differently and indifferently also, anyways there are always n-1 degrees of freedom to think differently for n+1 different ways looking at things.

Inspired by a spiral which is coincidentally a galaxy in our spatial system gives us views like --if one start from a point from outer end to reach at center, will reach from outside-in and if one starts from the center and circle outwards move than that will be inside-out thinking. So again its up to individuals, which way move. Traveling by we see stars and other objects binding each other with gravitational forces.

Galaxy

One of the many management strategy framework, Porter has given a outside-in approach for the organization strategy framework working towards corporates success or may be applicable to many scenarios. In which he suggest about forces influencing from outside and to investigate those scenario.

On the other side Prahalad and Hamel has proposed theory of inside-out approach gives us a core competences of the organization to utilize and plan many outcomes.

Taking a balance view of the approach gives us the suitability of the application for best fit solution. While in modern times we have techniques like six thinking hats by Dr. De Bono suggest us to wear different strategy hats for different scenario to make decisions, formulating strategy.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aligning Projects with CSR (Corporate social responsibility)

CSR ( Corporate social responsibility ) in context to Project management : Projects are unique entity units, they have a start and a logical end. Projects executes in a time frame with certain goals and objectives to achieve by the end of project and obviously Business as whole is connected with project where sustainability matters. Project managers seek responsibility and accountability from each team members in projects to make project a success, there comes the role of CSR wherein project managers can engage project members to achieve the stated objectives in a project in a sustainable way with responsibility. Corporates do CSR but at the corporate level, if we drill down CSR initiatives at the implementation level and align operational objectives with CSR which can drive projects in a holistic way by driving individuals inside-out from organization perspective and projects outside-in. CSR is just not one word but a gamut of activities are associated with it where in on...

Organization development in context

Egyptians left a mark of the civilization in the form of pyramids. pyramids are symbol of high integrity. Pyramids tells a story of time and  built symmetrically in layers. Pyramids have been built over a period of long time and not easily destroyed. Organizations development is a phenomenon which encompasses human potentials to be explored and directional in nature. Lets look at the pyramid again with help of a mirror, moving up from flat to top from concrete to transcendental and moving from flat to bottom reflects. Organization development OD is contextual again based on relevance. OD evolves on group and team purpose and objectives. OD Types  likely hood are hierarchical ,bureaucratic, matrix, ,pyramidal, entrepreneurial, flat, team oriented etc. in nature. Size of the organization also determines the type of development. OD reflects the culture of the org and it will encircle the overall vision and mission of the org by operating procedures. OD in recent ti...

Agile vs. Metrics

Vectorized from: Ken Schwaber, Mike Beedle: Agile Software Development with Scrum Prentice Hall PTR, 2001 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Over the years, its by human nature to quantify most of the aspect when it comes to Return on investment . Project dashboard are meant to provide bird view of the project's overall health from a top level perspective. Although it gives a broad level view of the time lines , resource utilization, budget and so on so forth. Can we quantify performance indicators like human aspect of deliverable like motivation levels of team members, quality of customer sustenance, business continuity etc. Since emotional intelligence has certain predominance over IQ definitely it matters. In concurrent times of agile development where practices like scrum, iterative development , extreme programming are kind of just in time techniques to deliver solutions to different kind of projects. can we be able to quantify human aspect of indicators in agile ...